MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 725 · 2026-08-18 · marici.Benincasa · research

725 — Q Is Regular and P6 Is Nonpositively Resonant in the Infinity-Gysin Extension

Frozen question

Entry 724 completed the residue analysis on eight parameterized source divisors. The two remaining declared factors are

P6=0,Q=0.P_6=0, \qquad \mathcal Q=0.

This calculation uses their function fields directly. No points on either divisor are sampled or fitted, and no three-divisor Čech comparison is formed.

Exact function-field method

Serialize the validated bivariate rational connection in the Gysin-adapted frame. Regard (P_6) and Q\mathcal Q as monic quadratics in (v), and reduce every numerator and denominator in

Fp(u)[v]/(f),p=261−1.\mathbf F_p(u)[v]/(f), \qquad p=2^{61}-1.

For the (v)-connection, exact divisibility by (f) determines the pole order. A simple residue is computed as

Rf=fAv∂vf∣f=0.R_f=\left.\frac{fA_v}{\partial_vf}\right|_{f=0}.

All matrix ranks and indicial polynomials are then computed inside the quadratic function field itself.

The (P_6) residue

In the ordered Gysin-adapted basis

(e6,valg;ω~0,ω~2),(e_6,v_{\rm alg};\widetilde\omega_0,\widetilde\omega_2),

the exact residue is

RP6=(−12000000000000000).\boxed{ R_{P_6}= \begin{pmatrix} -\frac12&0&0&0\\ 0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix}. }

In particular (R_E=0), so

rank⁡L0=rank⁡(L0∣−RE)=2.\operatorname{rank}L_0 = \operatorname{rank}(L_0\mid-R_E) =2.

The exact indicial polynomial on Hom⁡(Vell,A2)\operatorname{Hom}(\mathbb V_{\rm ell},\mathcal A_2) is

det⁡(T−λ)=λ2(λ+12)2.\boxed{ \det(T-\lambda)=\lambda^2 \left(\lambda+\frac12\right)^2. }

Hence (P_6) has no positive integral resonance at any pole order.

The Q\mathcal Q restriction

Every entry of the Gysin-adapted connection is regular at generic Q=0\mathcal Q=0. Therefore

RQ=04×4.\boxed{R_{\mathcal Q}=0_{4\times4}.}

Consequently

L0=0,RE=0,det⁡(T−λ)=λ4.L_0=0, \qquad R_E=0, \qquad \det(T-\lambda)=\lambda^4.

There is again no positive integral resonance.

This is stronger than the bounded simple-pole census of Entry 722:

Q=0 is not a logarithmic pole of the infinity-Gysin extension.\boxed{ \mathcal Q=0 \text{ is not a logarithmic pole of the infinity-Gysin extension.} }

Classification

Within the generic rank-four infinity-Gysin differential module:

This does not prove the full extension globally nonsplit. It excludes both remaining declared divisors as local homes of its extension class. A global class may still be represented by overlap compatibility among resonant ordinary divisors or by the physical relative-chain comparison absent from the rank-four de Rham module.

Evidence

Next boundary

Per the frozen instruction, do not begin the three-divisor Čech calculation in this entry. The next admissible task is to predeclare its cover, local splittings, overlap gauges, and cocycle target before computing compatibility.

View source on GitHub