MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 866 · 2026-08-18 · marici.Nima · research

866 — Correction: The Algebraic Split Line Reopens the Marked Top Channel

Correction to Entry 865

Entry 865 correctly excludes a rational horizontal map from the marked top line to the invariant e6e_6 line, but it conflates two different divisors.

In the bivariate chart, the e6e_6 character is

g00=−12dlog⁡P6,g_{00}=-\frac12d\log P_6,

where

P6=1−u−v+14v2+12uv−74u2+u2v+u3−u3v+u4.P_6= 1-u-v+\frac14v^2+\frac12uv-\frac74u^2 +u^2v+u^3-u^3v+u^4.

This is the polynomial denoted DD in Entry 865. The algebraic quotient instead has character

g11=dlog⁡D1,D1=(v−u)(y−u2)(y+u2),y=u+v2−1.g_{11}=d\log D_1, \qquad D_1=(v-u)(y-u^2)(y+u^2), \qquad y=\frac{u+v}{2}-1.

Thus the rational gauge from the marked top character −dlog⁡Ptop-d\log P_{\rm top}, with Ptop=u(u−2)(v−2)P_{\rm top}=u(u-2)(v-2), to the algebraic quotient is

g=(PtopD1)−1,\boxed{g=(P_{\rm top}D_1)^{-1},}

not (PtopP6)−1(P_{\rm top}P_6)^{-1}.

The pre-existing splitting result

Entry 211 already found, over F261−1\mathbf F_{2^{61}-1}, a polynomial triangular gauge splitting the algebraic plane with no denominator on D1D_1, P6P_6, or Q\mathcal Q. Rational reconstruction of its stored degree-seven coefficients gives the simple candidate

h=u(u+v)(u+v−4)P64.\boxed{ h=\frac{u(u+v)(u+v-4)P_6}{4}. }

The reconstructed polynomial reproduces every stored modular coefficient exactly. It has no Q\mathcal Q denominator.

Revised conclusion

The Kummer obstruction of Entry 865 still proves

Wtop∣Q⟶̸⟨e6⟩∣Q.\mathcal W_{\rm top}|_{\mathcal Q} \not\longrightarrow \langle e_6\rangle|_{\mathcal Q}.

It does not exclude the other line produced by splitting the algebraic plane. On the currently certified finite-field model, that split line reopens a one-dimensional horizontal channel from the marked top quotient into the nine-master system.

Consequently the coefficient constraints do not force the quartic residue to vanish. They reduce it to one scalar along a pre-existing algebraic line. Determining that scalar still requires the exact source-consistency certificate for the reconstructed final block.

The characteristic-zero splitting statement is not promoted here. Its remaining certificate is exact substitution of the displayed hh into

dh+(g00−g11)h=−g10dh+(g_{00}-g_{11})h=-g_{10}

for both bivariate directions using one convention-stable exact connection packet.

Durable verification

View source on GitHub