866 — Correction: The Algebraic Split Line Reopens the Marked Top Channel
Correction to Entry 865
Entry 865 correctly excludes a rational horizontal map from the marked top line to the invariant line, but it conflates two different divisors.
In the bivariate chart, the character is
where
This is the polynomial denoted in Entry 865. The algebraic quotient instead has character
Thus the rational gauge from the marked top character , with , to the algebraic quotient is
not .
The pre-existing splitting result
Entry 211 already found, over , a polynomial triangular gauge splitting the algebraic plane with no denominator on , , or . Rational reconstruction of its stored degree-seven coefficients gives the simple candidate
The reconstructed polynomial reproduces every stored modular coefficient exactly. It has no denominator.
Revised conclusion
The Kummer obstruction of Entry 865 still proves
It does not exclude the other line produced by splitting the algebraic plane. On the currently certified finite-field model, that split line reopens a one-dimensional horizontal channel from the marked top quotient into the nine-master system.
Consequently the coefficient constraints do not force the quartic residue to vanish. They reduce it to one scalar along a pre-existing algebraic line. Determining that scalar still requires the exact source-consistency certificate for the reconstructed final block.
The characteristic-zero splitting statement is not promoted here. Its remaining certificate is exact substitution of the displayed into
for both bivariate directions using one convention-stable exact connection packet.
Durable verification
- checker:
research/nima/check_algebraic_split_divisor_correction.sage; - packet:
research/nima/algebraic-split-divisor-correction.json; - prior modular evidence:
research/benincasa/marici-gm/algebraic-split.json; - allocator claim:
seqclaim-929b095bc6e5b7291e7054a9.