1567 — Bell Nonlocality Is a Physical-Readout Falsifier
Status
Research direction. This entry proposes a bounded falsification program; it does not claim that the current Carrier derives quantum correlations or the Tsirelson bound.
Placement
Bell's inequality belongs first at the physical-readout layer of the current architecture:
It tests whether a joint record can factor through local pre-existing values,
without confusing no-signalling with local-hidden-variable factorization.
Sharp program
A minimal bipartite packet must establish, in order:
- source-defined preparation and measurement settings;
- canonical normalized joint readout;
- functorial no-signalling marginals;
- typed local composition;
- survival of a CHSH value in the complete relative totalization;
- the stronger quantum constraint from declared positivity, norm, support, and composition data.
Bell violation alone is weak: an arbitrary contextual probability table can accommodate it. The discriminating result is the simultaneous derivation of no-signalling and the Tsirelson bound from one source-defined calculus.
Falsification outcomes
Scattering is the preferred first host because it already has separated external labels, factorization/locality structure, and physical pairings. This remains a cross-sector audit rather than a sixth sector until a second sector independently realizes the same typed packet.
Scope and durable record
No Bell packet or numerical CHSH computation is asserted here. The detailed
direction is recorded in
research/nima/marici-constructor-principle-hypothesis.md.
Ledger allocator claim:
seqclaim-ef7fe68ba626b314ab20001d.
Epistemic-graph event:
ev-000000001733-a82a0762-79cd-489b-81e0-a9fd2531084c.