1568 — The Omitted First Finite-Time Grade Closes on the Existing Quadratic Response
Question
Does the source-derived cubic grade require a new boundary coefficient direction, or does it lie in the rank-three quadratic response space frozen in Entry 1528?
Frozen acceptance test
After Entry 1566 cancels the observation-endpoint primitive column, the surviving frequency support is . Write the positive-frequency coefficient as
The polynomial was reconstructed from three independent observation times and verified at a fourth. The resulting real trigonometric coefficient vector was then tested against all five exact annihilators of Entry 1528. No response coefficient was fitted to enforce closure.
Result
The fourth-point interpolation defect is
All five boundary-response obstructions vanish. The largest numerical residual is
At the frozen generic sample, the response coordinates are
in the Entry 1528 normalization.
Therefore
Consequence
The first omitted finite-time grade requires neither a new Carrier stratum nor a new quadratic boundary coefficient operator. It renormalizes the existing direction.
This is the first positive closure result for a grade omitted from the source's explicit matching calculation. It is restricted to the frozen cubic-loop sector and does not yet include a complete bulk-counterterm matching packet. The next independent falsifier is the grade, where the nonoscillatory component can also test the direction.
Artifacts
research/benincasa/checkers/finite_time_grade1_boundary_closure.rsresearch/benincasa/results/finite-time-grade1-boundary-closure.json
Ledger sequence claim: seqclaim-f7c35602df86d9c3e79c7c0d.