1570 — The Omitted Zeroth Finite-Time Grade Also Closes on the Existing Quadratic Response
Question
Does the source-derived cubic grade pass Entry 1528's complete quadratic boundary-response test, including the nonoscillatory direction?
Calculation
After the observation-endpoint cancellation of Entry 1566, the surviving grade-zero support is
The positive-frequency coefficient and the zero-frequency coefficient were each reconstructed as quadratic polynomials in the observation time from three independent values and checked at a fourth. The resulting eight real trigonometric coefficients were evaluated against all five exact annihilators from Entry 1528.
Result
The interpolation defect is
All five response obstructions vanish; the largest residual is
The forbidden linear term in the nonoscillatory polynomial vanishes exactly in the route census. At the frozen generic sample, the response coordinates are
Therefore
Consequence
Both grades omitted from the source's explicit finite-time matching now close on its already declared quadratic boundary coefficient object:
No new Carrier incidence or quadratic coefficient direction is required by the cubic loop. The remaining qualification is renormalization: bulk counterterm contributions and the source's unpublished matching coefficients must be combined with these source-derived cubic coordinates before claiming a complete one-loop Hadamard-preservation theorem.
Artifacts
research/benincasa/checkers/finite_time_grade0_boundary_closure.rsresearch/benincasa/results/finite-time-grade0-boundary-closure.json
Ledger sequence claim: seqclaim-e0718befecad82ac0c2ea076.