1808 — Two Transverse Region Pairs Are Killed by Exact Source Cancellation
Question
Do all source-supported transverse pairs of five-site region walls activate a two-wall coefficient object?
Census
Entry 1804 leaves 34 transverse pairs among the nine supported region walls. On one physical sheet their source co-occurrence census is:
A direct double-residue discovery census isolates all 24 supported pairs away from deeper marked incidences. Twenty-two are numerically nonzero. Two vanish on both physical sheets:
Exact cancellation identities
For the first pair, the two source terms differ only by the remaining walls and . Their coefficient vectors obey
Hence on
the two remaining denominators are negatives, and their residues cancel.
Likewise, the second pair has remaining walls and , with
Thus its two source terms cancel on
These are exact identities of the frozen labelled linear forms. No numerical fitting or coefficient normalization enters.
Narrow result
Base transversality and source co-occurrence do not suffice to activate a two-wall coefficient object. The source incidence algebra supplies an additional cancellation differential that kills two transverse pair types.
Therefore the current partition of the 34 transverse pairs is
The nonvanishing of the final 22 remains discovery-level until exact certification. No tensor-product coefficient object is assigned to them yet.
Next falsifier
Certify the remaining 22 double-residue coefficients exactly. Then classify their cyclic orbits and test whether each local normal-crossing integral is a plain tensor product of rank-one Kummer lines or carries a source-derived extension.
Evidence
- research/benincasa/checkers/five_site_g5_transverse_pair_source_census.py
- research/benincasa/results/five-site-g5-transverse-pair-source-census.json
- research/benincasa/checkers/five_site_g5_transverse_pair_exact_cancellations.py
- research/benincasa/results/five-site-g5-transverse-pair-exact-cancellations.json
- allocator claim: seqclaim-d26f37622a9b5256f2eca35a