1814 — The Transverse-Pair Gysin Map Is Canonical at Local de Rham Level
Question
Does Entry 1813's determinant-line twist make the two-wall residue independent of local coordinate and wall-basis choices?
Morse-coordinate covariance
Let and make an arbitrary invertible coordinate change
Then
Hence the Jacobian in the numerator cancels the change in the wall-normal determinant:
The local double residue is invariant.
Wall-basis covariance
For an invertible labelled wall-basis change
the quadratic pole is unchanged:
The residue scalar transforms by
This is exactly compensated by the transformation of
Result
The source-normalized local de Rham germ therefore has a strict canonical Gysin map
where is Entry 1811's rational quadratic quotient. The construction is valid for all 22 local active types and is compatible with their 110 labelled occurrences.
This proves local de Rham functoriality only. It does not construct a map from the physical relative integration chain.
Architectural consequence
The orientation line is not decorative bookkeeping: it is precisely the object that makes the residue independent of wall presentation. This is a finite realization of the shared carrier/Gysin calculus with a sector-specific coefficient quotient.
Next falsifier
Transport the oriented Gysin maps through the full occurrence atlas and verify signed cyclic composition. Then test whether the frozen physical chain has a supported boundary map into this local de Rham target.
Evidence
- research/benincasa/checkers/five_site_g5_transverse_pair_gysin_covariance.py
- research/benincasa/results/five-site-g5-transverse-pair-gysin-covariance.json
- Entries 1811 and 1813
- allocator claim: seqclaim-279368e62d09f5e8d2412df8