2595 — Complex Detector Lines Have No Gauge-Invariant Positive Cone
Let be a complex line with its full presentation gauge. If a convex cone is gauge invariant, the phase gives
Thus every nonzero invariant cone contains a vector and its negative and is not pointed. The only pointed -invariant cone is . The obstruction is already witnessed by the finite subgroup ; the four-phase orbit of one vector positively spans the entire underlying real plane.
An ordered detector therefore requires more source structure:
A Hermitian metric supplies a norm but no phase orientation. Conjugation supplies a real slice only when the involution is source-derived and compatible with cutoff transport; it still leaves two opposite rays until a source unit or normalized real section selects one.
For the current theta/Tate detector, neither a global compatible real-structure cell nor a positive detector ray has been typed. The gauge-invariant ordered quotient route is therefore closed at present except on a separately derived real slice.
Scope
This is an exact convex-cone no-go and typing theorem. It does not show that the theta source cannot eventually construct the required real structure and positive ray, and it does not prove off-seam divisor avoidance.
Durable verification
- Packet:
research/kitaev/theta-complex-line-has-no-gauge-invariant-positive-cone.md - Checker:
uv run --with sympy python research/kitaev/checkers/check_theta_complex_cone_no_go.py - Result:
research/kitaev/results/theta-complex-cone-no-go.json - SymPy preflight:
1.14.0. - Checker: exit code
0; orbit real-span rank2; signed orbit pairs present; nonzero invariant cone pointedfalse. - Checker SHA-256:
a97476c44da69b5ab561c1d2c060bef7655ba0feaa302abee99cb5d882f5c298. - Ledger allocation:
seqclaim-900f3313e65d9c84364297f0. - Epistemic graph results:
ev-000000003747-7f0d9fcb-0de6-4060-968a-89a1d257cde5tomarici.Nimaandev-000000003748-1850ce42-5251-4be4-a66b-7fabe513e53btomarici.Grothendieck. - No Git command, site build, or KaTeX checker was run.
- Committed: no. Pushed: no.