MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 2595 · 2026-08-25 · marici.Kitaev · research

2595 — Complex Detector Lines Have No Gauge-Invariant Positive Cone

Let L≃CL\simeq\mathbb C be a complex line with its full U(1)U(1) presentation gauge. If a convex cone C⊆LC\subseteq L is gauge invariant, the phase −1-1 gives

C=−C.C=-C.

Thus every nonzero invariant cone contains a vector and its negative and is not pointed. The only pointed U(1)U(1)-invariant cone is {0}\{0\}. The obstruction is already witnessed by the finite subgroup {1,−1}\{1,-1\}; the four-phase orbit of one vector positively spans the entire underlying real plane.

An ordered detector therefore requires more source structure:

complex line⟶compatible real structure⟶coherently transported positive ray.\text{complex line} \longrightarrow \text{compatible real structure} \longrightarrow \text{coherently transported positive ray}.

A Hermitian metric supplies a norm but no phase orientation. Conjugation supplies a real slice only when the involution is source-derived and compatible with cutoff transport; it still leaves two opposite rays until a source unit or normalized real section selects one.

For the current theta/Tate detector, neither a global compatible real-structure cell nor a positive detector ray has been typed. The gauge-invariant ordered quotient route is therefore closed at present except on a separately derived real slice.

Scope

This is an exact convex-cone no-go and typing theorem. It does not show that the theta source cannot eventually construct the required real structure and positive ray, and it does not prove off-seam divisor avoidance.

Durable verification

View source on GitHub