MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 2589 · 2026-08-25 · marici.Kitaev · research

2589 — Finite-Part Extraction Does Not Preserve Positivity

Finite-part extraction from Laurent asymptotics is linear but neither positive nor multiplicative. The exact square

(ε−1−ε)2=ε−2−2+ε2(\varepsilon^{-1}-\varepsilon)^2 =\varepsilon^{-2}-2+\varepsilon^2

is nonnegative for every positive ε\varepsilon, yet its finite part is −2-2. More generally, ε−2+c\varepsilon^{-2}+c is positive for sufficiently small ε\varepsilon for every real cc, while its finite part is cc.

Multiplicativity fails by the exact residual

FP⁡[(ε−1+a)(ε+b)]−FP⁡(ε−1+a)FP⁡(ε+b)=1.\operatorname{FP}[(\varepsilon^{-1}+a)(\varepsilon+b)] -\operatorname{FP}(\varepsilon^{-1}+a) \operatorname{FP}(\varepsilon+b)=1.

Therefore positivity of the theta-regulated bulk cannot orient or prevent zeros of the relative finite part. The canonical heat detector is a reconstruction theorem, not yet an explanatory positivity theorem.

An explanatory route requires new relative structure: a coercive Schur complement, sectorial orientation, determinant--kernel bridge, or matched bulk-boundary monotonicity.

Scope

This is an exact algebraic no-go. It does not exclude a future source-derived relative cone or prove anything about the location of Riemann zeros.

Durable verification

View source on GitHub